Posts Tagged ‘SAT Critical Reading’

Help for Passage-Based Questions on the SAT Critical Reading Section

April 15th, 2010 by Kate Hedman

There is a very simple way to deal with long, difficult, and boring Critical Reading passages on the SAT: don’t read them. Surprisingly, you can answer all of the questions correctly without reading any of the long passages from beginning to end, and instead using the line references to guide you. Remember, your goal when taking the SAT is to get as many points as possible. You’re not reading for pleasure, you’re reading to find the answer to specific questions posed by the test-makers. So it makes sense to use their questions to guide your reading.

When faced with a long critical reading passage, you should follow a series of steps. First, read the blurb in italics. This will give you valuable contextual information about the passage. Second, look for line references in the questions and answer only questions that have them, skipping any that either lack line numbers or ask about the passage as a whole. Third, go back and answer any questions without line references. Let’s look at those steps in more detail, using an example from the College Board’s website.

Step One: Read the italics. In our example passage, the italics state “This passage is an excerpt from a work published in 2000 by a Chinese American writer.” We didn’t learn too much here, but we do know that this is a recently written work by a person with a mixed cultural background.

Step Two: Answer questions that have line references. In order to do this with the example passage, we are going to skip the first question, because although it has a line reference, it is asking for what “the passage as a whole suggests.” We can’t answer that yet. We can, however, answer the second question by reading lines 75-81. The lines in the line reference are clearly describing how well this Chinese American is fitting in in China, so the answer must be D. Similarly, we would use line references to answer the third question. We need to read the lines around line 53 to learn that the “revelation” is the fact that everyone around the person in question is similar to him or her. To answer the question correctly, we need to figure out which of the given lines shows that statement to be untrue, checking out each answer to see which one accomplishes that. The correct answer is E, because the “epiphany” is that he or she does not fit in.

Step Three: Go back and answer any questions about the passage as a whole. We skipped the first question because it asked what “the passage as a whole suggests” about a specific line. Now we can use what we’ve learned in the line references to answer it. Because we read lines about the person fitting in in China followed by lines that stated that the sense of belonging was false, the answer that makes the most sense is that being a “citizen of the world” is D, “an unrealistic goal.”

A lot of the passage went unread when we used this technique to answer the questions, and if we have extra time at the end, it is perfectly reasonable to go back and read some more of it to gather further evidence for our answers. However, it is important to note that we are reading for just that: to gather evidence for our answers. We need read no more of the passage than we need to answer the questions. Keep your goal in mind: to get as many points as possible. And use these steps when approaching a long passage. You will save time and increase your SAT score.

Kate Hedman, MSEd, has been helping students succeed on the SAT for seven years. She has been a verbal teacher with ESC for six years, and taught high school English for three years. She loves reading about new advances in brain research that she can use in the classroom to help her students learn how to achieve higher scores on the SAT.

The Guessing Rule: SAT Critical Reading and Writing Sections

March 23rd, 2010 by Kate Hedman

The Critical Reading section is a great place to guess when you’re not sure of an answer to a question. But how do you know when to guess? Well, the basic rule is to guess when you can eliminate one choice. This applies to the Writing section as well, but apparently not to the Math section, as Marty Rafson explains in his post, Guessing Versus Omitting.

The reason that guessing after eliminating one choice works comes down to the fact that by eliminating just one of the five possible answers, you’re taking the same basic scoring formula that the test-makers use to ensure that random guessing neither statistically harms nor benefits the test-taker, and making it work in your favor. The basic rules for earning points on an SAT state that one point is added to your raw score when you answer a question correctly, and ¼ of a point is deducted from your raw score when you answer a question incorrectly. Each question has five possible answer choices, so a random guesser would end up neither gaining nor losing any points. He would get 1 of every 5 of the questions correct, adding a point for that correct answer and subtracting ¼ of a point for each of the four incorrect answers. That’s a net gain of zero points! Because leaving questions blank doesn’t affect an SAT score one way or the other, it makes no statistical sense to guess randomly! If, on the other hand, you can eliminate at least one of the answer choices, everything changes.

If, instead of five possible answers, each question only had four, then a student guessing on four questions would, statistically, get one of those correct. So he would now add a point to his score. He’d also get three wrong, subtracting ¼ of a point each. But now, instead of a net gain of zero, there is a net gain of ¼ of a point! Wow! Just by eliminating one answer on each question, this test-taker earned ¼ of a point! If that test-taker guessed on the entire Critical Reading section with its 67 questions, that would equal a rounded raw score of four! Not too impressive, but it’s better than zero. In any case, there is probably no situation in which anyone would take their guessing to that extreme.

Process of elimination is a valuable tool to use on the Critical Reading and Writing sections whenever you are not sure of an answer. And the guessing formula is something to keep in mind whenever you are not sure of the answer to a question. The more answers you can eliminate, the better your odds. So gamble against the test-makers and take a guess if you can eliminate at least one choice – the odds are in your favor!

Kate Hedman, MSEd, has been helping students succeed on the SAT for seven years. She has been a verbal teacher with ESC for six years, and taught high school English for three years. She loves reading about new advances in brain research that she can use in the classroom to help her students learn how to achieve higher scores on the SAT.

SAT Sentence Completion Strategies

March 18th, 2010 by Kate Hedman

Nineteen of the sixty-seven questions in the Critical Reading portion of any SAT are sentence completions. These are questions that require you to use your understanding of sentence logic and vocabulary to choose the correct word (or pair of words) to fill in the blank (or blanks) in sentences. In the following paragraphs, we’re going to discuss how to work through a sentence completion question, using an example from the College Board’s website. Their site provides an explanation for the answer, but they don’t explain in depth how to arrive at it. That’s what we’re going to do here.

Because King Philip’s desire to make Spain the dominant power in sixteenth-century Europe ran counter to Queen Elizabeth’s insistence on autonomy for England, ——- was ——-.

(A) reconciliation . . assured

(B) warfare . . avoidable

(C) ruination . . impossible

(D) conflict . . inevitable

(E) diplomacy . . simple

To work through a sentence completion like this one, start by reading the sentence, focusing on logical relationships. In this case, the part of the sentence before the comma tells us that King Philip’s and Queen Elizabeth’s desires are in conflict with one another. The key words “counter to” highlight the idea that Spain being dominant and England being autonomous (self-governing) cannot happen at the same time. The words in the blanks must signify that there is a conflict. Their meanings depend upon one another, and they must either be a pair that means “peaceful coexistence” was “impossible,” or “fighting” was “unavoidable.” Now, in order to find the correct word pair among the answer choices, try plugging each one into the sentence to see which pair has the correct type of logical relationship that fits in the sentence.

Choice A is incorrect: there was a conflict, so reconciliation was not assured.
Choice B is incorrect: the conflict was a big one between nations – warfare may have been unavoidable.
Choice C is not correct; the conflict between these two nations did not make ruination impossible.
Choice D is the only answer so far that makes sense: in the situation the sentence describes, conflict was definitely inevitable. That sounds like the correct answer. But, so that we can be certain, we’ll look at choice E, “diplomacy” and “simple.” Because the logic of the sentence tells us that diplomacy was not simple, that can’t possibly be the answer. Having eliminated all of the other choices, we can be pretty sure that the correct answer is choice D, “conflict” and “inevitable.” Just to make certain, we’ll re-read the sentence with our word choices in the blanks:

 “Because King Philip’s desire to make Spain the dominant power in sixteenth-century Europe ran counter to Queen Elizabeth’s insistence on autonomy for England, conflict was inevitable.” That sentence is logically consistent, so choice D is our answer.

Sentence completion questions like the one we worked through above are really four-step problems. This may sound like a lot of work, but breaking down the harder questions into four steps actually makes more difficult ones more solvable. Let’s take a look at the four steps we used to answer that sentence completion problem.

Step one: figure out what the sentence is trying to say. Step two: infer what should be in the blank (or blanks) by using words from your own head that fit with the sentence’s logic. Step three: look at the answer choices, searching for words that match up with your inferences. Step four: re-read the sentence with your answer choice in place of the blank (or blanks), making sure the completed sentence makes sense. Particularly for the questions that contain more difficult logic and vocabulary, it’s important to break the work down into these four steps in order to choose the best possible answer.

Remember, you’ve been taking an SAT prep course and learning a lot of new vocabulary. You may be surprised at how much you know. If a sentence completion seems difficult, make sure you work through it one step at a time. Your objective is to get as many points as possible on the SAT. Getting as many correct answers to sentence completions as possible will help you toward that objective.

Kate Hedman, MSEd, has been helping students succeed on the SAT for seven years. She has been a verbal teacher with ESC for six years, and taught high school English for three years. She loves reading about new advances in brain research that she can use in the classroom to help her students learn how to achieve higher scores on the SAT.

Small SAT Score Gains Mean Big College Admissions Gains

February 24th, 2010 by Kate Hedman

Whether or not you think your admission to college should be governed by your SAT score, there is evidence that it is, and that a mere 30 point jump in your Critical Reading score can get you into college. For more information, take a look at this USA Today article from May 2009. What do you think? Are colleges relying too much on SAT scores?

Share your comments below.

Kate Hedman, MSEd, has been helping students succeed on the SAT for seven years. She has been a verbal teacher with ESC for six years, and taught high school English for three years. She loves reading about new advances in brain research that she can use in the classroom to help her students learn how to achieve higher scores on the SAT.